What are the best practices and recommendations for governments and oversight agencies regarding transparency, integrity and anti-corruption in response to extreme climate events? Please include examples of actions from other countries, encompassing prevention, adaptation, immediate response and reconstruction processes.
The climate crisis has resulted in an increase in frequency and severity of extreme weather and climate events. In response to this, the international community and national governments have allocated funds for adaptation and response projects to enhance societal resilience and mitigate the impact of these events. However, emergency funding - particularly in the immediate aftermath of a crisis - can create opportunities for corrupt public officials to misappropriate funds, manipulate project direction, or demand bribes from communities. Longer term adaptation and reconstruction projects are also at risk of political interference and manipulation. To safeguard such projects, decision-makers should implement anti-corruption and integrity measures throughout these responses, and even before a disaster takes place.
Contents
Background
Corruption and resilience to extreme weather and climate events
Corruption risks
Political corruption
Petty corruption
Overarching integrity and anti-corruption measures
Integrity and anti-corruption measures at the decision-making level
Integrity and anti-corruption measures at the project level