U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre

This Anti-Corruption Helpdesk brief was produced in response to a query from a U4 Partner Agency. The U4 Helpdesk is operated by Transparency International in collaboration with the U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre based at the Chr. Michelsen Institute.

Query

Please provide an overview of corruption and anti-corruption within the research sector and university system in Bolivia.

Summary

Higher education is a sensitive sector for corruption as it involves a substantial amount of resources and high degrees of discretion. In particular, Bolivia dedicates around 17% of its annual budget, more than most Latin American Countries, to this sub-sector. The specific areas of corruption risks in higher education are: i) accreditation and quality control; ii) administration; iii) recruitment and admission; iv) academic integrity. Bribery, embezzlement, misappropriation/fraud, trading in influence, abuse of power/influence, collusion, patronage, nepotism, clientelism, and conflict of interest are the most common types of corruption occurring in the higher education sector. The following specific measures are proposed to decrease the risk of corruption in the higher education sector: control and sanctions; whistle-blower protection; ranking and accreditation; ethical code / code of conduct; promotion of academic integrity; monitoring of universities expenditure.

Contents

  1. Corruption in the Bolivian higher education sector and university system
  2. Corruption in Bolivian higher education sector: a risk assessment
  3. Measures to fight corruption in Bolivian higher education sector
  4. Conclusions

Main points

  • Bolivia dedicates around 17% of its annual budget to education, more than most Latin American countries.
  • Bolivia does not have specific regulations to address corruption in higher education as it refers to the broader anti-corruption legal framework, which has been consistently reformed in the last decade.
  • The higher education sector features four main areas of risk: accreditation and quality control; administration; recruitment and admission; academic integrity.
  • The following specific measures are proposed to decrease the risk of corruption in the higher education sector: control and sanctions; whistleblower protection; ranking and accreditation; ethical code/code of conduct; promotion of academic integrity; monitoring of universities expenditure.

Caveat

For the purpose of this Helpdesk answer, higher education is understood to include teaching, research, and related work (Pucciarelli& Kaplan Andreas, 2016).

Authors

Fabrizio Costantino

Reviewers:

Roberto Martinez B. Kukutschka, Transparency International and Monica Kirya, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre

Date

20/01/2020

Tags

Close search

Responsive versions of the site in progress.