What are the unintended consequences of AML/CFT laws and regulations? Please provide an overview of incidents in which they have been used by governments to restrict civic space and infringe on human rights?
Civic space and human rights have been under assault across the world, and, in some settings, AML/CFT regulations have played a major role in legitimising and providing justification for these measures at the domestic level.
FATF’s law and policymaking processes do not provide any meaningful transparency or opportunities for civil society engagement, neither at the domestic, nor at the international level. With little input from human rights organisations and experts, the “counter-risks” of abuse and misappropriation for AML/CFT regulations only increase. Despite advances to FATF’s Recommendation 8, which concerns TF risks for non-profit organisations, significant issues remain. Measures taken under the guise of AML/CFT regulations include heavy restrictions on CSOs’ ability to register, operate, and access resources, as well as direct measures against specific CSOs, such as audits, investigations, prosecution, de-registration, closure and expulsion.
Caveat: this Helpdesk Answer was commissioned to subsidise contributions to FATF’s public consultation on the “unintended consequences” of AML/CFT regulations.
1. Overview of AML/CFT’s impact on civic space and human rights
a. Civil society’s role in countering terrorism and money laundering
b. Rising concerns about AML/CFT regulation abuse
2.FATF’s law-making process
a. Domestic repercussions
3. FATF and NPOs
a. Actual risks
c. Restrictions on foreign donations
Guilherme France, email@example.com
Sophie Lemaitre (U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre)